Homeo AI vs OpusGo: Mobile Repertory or AI Copilot?

Quick answer

Choose OpusGo when the priority is carrying a maintained repertory and materia medica library on iOS or Android, building an analysis manually, saving it to a patient file, and exporting an analysis to RadarOpus or another OpusGo user. Choose Homeo AI when the harder task begins before the repertory: turning consultation language into an editable structure, reviewing proposed mappings and source passages, documenting a differential, and preserving the reasoning through follow-ups.

OpusGo is a mobile repertory product from Zeus Soft, the company behind RadarOpus. Its current offer combines a functional free version, a yearly Premium library, and separately rented yearly add-ons. Homeo AI is a browser-based practitioner copilot organized around narrative case review. The buying question is therefore not "app or website." It is whether the clinic needs a portable licensed reference and analysis environment, a note-to-reasoning workflow, or a controlled handoff between both.

What OpusGo currently offers

The official OpusGo product page describes apps for iOS and Android with repertory search, materia medica access, symptom clipboards, analyses, patient management, and mobile use. The official App Store listing identifies Zeus Soft as the seller and describes a free download with in-app purchases. It also lists iOS 15 or later for iPhone and iPad and reports data categories that may be linked to identity, including purchases, contact information, and identifiers. Those are current vendor and store statements, not an independent audit of the app.

The official May 2026 manual, linked below, documents a concrete workflow. A practitioner opens a repertory, browses or searches for rubrics, takes symptoms into a clipboard, views a compact or wide analysis, reads materia medica for leading remedies, and saves the work to a patient file. The analysis menu can export a RadarOpus analysis or send it to another OpusGo user.

The manual also documents patient and analysis backup for later import, restoring purchases after reinstalling the app, and menu support in ten languages in the reviewed release. At the same time, it says an internet connection is needed to start and work with OpusGo. The App Store description refers to partial offline capabilities. Because those first-party descriptions are not identical, a clinic should test the exact offline sequence instead of relying on either phrase.

Price the library, not just the download

OpusGo can be downloaded without charge, but the free label does not describe every source a practitioner may need. The official pricing page reviewed on 25 July 2026 shows a free version, a Premium bundle at €59 per year, and yearly add-ons starting at €7. It lists Synthesis Adonis at €15 per year, Mental Qualities at €10, Thematic Repertory at €7, and Suggesta 2.0 at €25. The page says the displayed prices are indicative and can vary by country and local tax.

The free English library shown on the pricing page includes the Repertory of Kent, Boericke's Pocket Manual, Hahnemann's Organon, and Kent's Lectures on Homoeopathic Philosophy. The Premium English bundle includes Core Synthesis 2016 plus other repertories and materia medica works. Availability varies by language and market, so the clinic must capture the exact in-app store for the account and region being tested.

The terms add an important dependency. Premium must be active before a user can rent or purchase available add-ons. A yearly subscription renews automatically unless cancelled through the app. A started rental period is not refundable. This means the cost of one specialist document may include both Premium and that document's rental.

Build a three-year manifest before comparing prices. List Premium, every required add-on, local tax, supported devices, app-store accounts, RadarOpus if needed, training time, backup effort, and price changes. Do not compare the €59 Premium figure with a full desktop suite or an AI subscription without matching the actual job and content.

Where OpusGo is genuinely stronger

OpusGo's clearest strength is portable access to named repertory and materia medica content. A practitioner can search a familiar source, take rubrics into an analysis, compare remedies, and save the work to a patient while away from a desktop. That is useful during travel, teaching, home visits, or any setting where opening a full computer is awkward.

The RadarOpus export is also a specific advantage for an existing Zeus Soft user. The manual says the analysis can be saved as a RadarOpus analysis. A clinic can test whether a mobile clipboard created during a visit reaches the desktop product without re-entering every rubric. This is more concrete than a generic claim of integration.

The free library makes a practical trial possible before payment. A practitioner can evaluate search speed, rubric navigation, screen density, patient-file handling, backup, and device comfort using included public-domain sources. Premium then adds named content rather than merely removing an arbitrary time limit.

OpusGo is therefore the stronger fit when the buying checklist starts with a mobile repertory, named licensed or public-domain documents, manual rubric control, and continuity with RadarOpus.

What OpusGo does not remove

The app does not remove the interpretation between a consultation narrative and a rubric. The manual workflow starts with opening a repertory and selecting rubrics. A practitioner must still preserve the patient's expression, decide which details carry weight, search the correct vocabulary, reject misleading matches, and explain why the resulting analysis matters.

The product page's mobile convenience does not prove that every source is available in every country or language. The pricing page shows different document sets by market. The terms allow features to vary and say translation accuracy is not always guaranteed. Obtain screenshots or an exported store manifest from the actual account before committing a teaching program or clinic workflow to a particular edition.

Export is not the same as full record interoperability. The manual demonstrates analysis export, patient backup, and import, but the clinic must test what fields, dates, notes, source identities, and edits survive the handoff. A file that opens successfully can still omit context needed for review.

The terms also describe the app and its content as educational and place responsibility for monitoring, handling, control, selection, installation, and results on the user. A clinic should not infer diagnostic validation from the Medical category in an app store.

Where Homeo AI fits instead

Homeo AI is the more direct fit when the repeated burden is preparing the case before manual repertorization. Its workflow is intended to preserve narrative notes, propose an editable symptom structure, surface candidate mappings and source passages, support a documented differential, and keep the reasons visible when the patient returns.

The relevant measurement is repair burden. Does the tool keep qualifiers attached to the correct observation? Can the practitioner see why a candidate mapping appeared? How many material corrections are needed? Does a second practitioner understand what was accepted, rejected, and left uncertain? These questions are different from the number of repertories in a mobile library.

Homeo AI does not claim that its browser workflow contains every OpusGo document or licensed Synthesis edition. A combined setup may be reasonable: Homeo AI for note structuring and review, OpusGo for mobile source lookup and analysis, then RadarOpus for a deeper desktop environment. The combination is justified only if it reduces work and preserves context across handoffs.

Test the handoff, not the logos

Prepare ten completed, de-identified cases representing the clinic's normal variation. Remove names, contact details, dates of birth, faces, document numbers, exact visit dates, account identifiers, and rare combinations that could identify a person. Keep an answer sheet outside both products with the original narrative, accepted symptom structure, chosen rubrics, sources checked, corrections, and the reason for the final differential.

In OpusGo, use the exact free or paid source manifest being evaluated. For each case, record the time to find rubrics, build the clipboard, inspect leading remedies, open materia medica, save the analysis, reopen the patient, and export the work. Import half the exported analyses into the target RadarOpus environment and compare every rubric, remedy score, note, source identity, and date with the original. Export and restore a patient backup on another approved device.

Repeat the same cases in Homeo AI. Record the proposed symptom structure, accepted and rejected mappings, source passages reviewed, correction time, unresolved ambiguity, and whether a second practitioner can reconstruct the reasoning. Reopen five cases as follow-ups and confirm that new observations remain separate from the original totality.

Score each workflow on:

1. Minutes from narrative to reviewable analysis. 2. Material interpretation or rubric-selection errors. 3. Time to repair an error. 4. Exact source identity and edition. 5. Completeness of analysis export and import. 6. Patient backup and restore behavior. 7. Operation with limited or interrupted connectivity. 8. Device readability and input effort. 9. Clarity for a second reviewer. 10. Total three-year content, subscription, support, and administration cost.

Run an additional boundary test. Start with a free OpusGo account and document which sources are genuinely available. Activate Premium in a controlled test account, capture the new library, add only one specialist document, then cancel renewal and record what remains accessible at the end of the period. This settles the dependency more reliably than a price table.

Privacy, safety, and operational limits

Mobile patient files create ordinary device risks. Test screen lock, account recovery, shared app-store accounts, notification previews, device backup, exported files, lost-device response, and staff access. The OpusGo terms discuss personal registration and purchase data, but a clinic still needs a complete answer for patient-file storage, analysis export, support access, deletion, and cross-device transfer.

Homeo AI requires its own privacy review. Confirm processing location, user access, retention, deletion, export, support access, and service interruption procedures. Use only de-identified material until the data path and legal basis are approved.

Neither product should make an emergency-care decision or replace diagnosis, referral, emergency care, practitioner judgment, prescription, potency, dosage, or follow-up responsibility. A repertory score, materia medica passage, suggested mapping, or generated differential is an input for professional review, not proof of a diagnosis or the safety or efficacy of a treatment.

Conditional verdict

Choose OpusGo if the clinic needs a maintained mobile repertory, named reference content, manual analysis, patient files, and a tested RadarOpus export. Price the Premium dependency and every required yearly add-on, then verify the real library and connectivity behavior on the actual device.

Choose Homeo AI if the larger cost is converting consultation language into a transparent, correctable case structure and preserving the reasons behind the differential through follow-ups. Judge it on correction time, source traceability, and review clarity.

Use both only if the export and review boundary is explicit. The right combined workflow should preserve original wording, accepted rubrics, source editions, corrections, and record ownership without forcing the practitioner to maintain conflicting patient files.

Official sources checked

• OpusGo official product page
• OpusGo official pricing and document list
• OpusGo official May 2026 manual
• OpusGo official terms of service
• OpusGo official Apple App Store listing

Product facts reviewed 2026-07-25. Confirm current features, prices, source libraries, and terms with the vendor.